Risk assessment in construction

In construction, the biggest failure point in risk assessment is not identifying hazards, it’s keeping assessments accurate, accessible, and up to date as site conditions change.

First published on Thursday, January 29, 2026

Last updated on Thursday, January 29, 2026

Construction sites are high-risk environments by nature. Conditions change daily, multiple trades operate side-by-side, and hazards are often temporary but severe. A construction risk assessment is how those risks are identified, controlled, and kept under review so work can proceed safely and legally.

In this guide we explain what a construction risk assessment is, what UK law requires, who is responsible, and how to carry one out in practice using a clear, site-ready approach.

What is a construction risk assessment?

A construction risk assessment is a structured process for identifying hazards on a construction site, assessing the level of risk they pose, and deciding what controls are needed to prevent harm.

In simple terms, it answers three questions:

  • What could cause harm?

  • Who could be harmed and how?

  • What needs to be done to reduce the risk?

A good construction risk assessment is specific to the task and site, easy to understand, and actively used by supervisors and workers not a generic document created once and forgotten.

Yes. Under UK health and safety law, employers and those in control of construction work must carry out suitable and sufficient risk assessments.

The legal duty comes primarily from the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, which require employers to assess risks to employees and to others who may be affected by their work.

In construction, this duty is reinforced by the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015), which place responsibilities on clients, contractors and designers to plan, manage and monitor health and safety throughout a project.

Failing to carry out adequate risk assessments can lead to enforcement action, project delays, and serious harm.

Who is responsible for risk assessments on a construction project?

Responsibility depends on who controls the work, but in practice:

  • Employers must assess risks arising from their work activities.

  • Contractors are responsible for assessing risks within their scope of work.

  • Principal contractors must coordinate risk management across the site.

  • Clients must ensure suitable arrangements are in place for managing health and safety.

Risk assessments should be carried out by competent persons, people with the knowledge, experience and authority to identify hazards and implement controls.

The 5-step construction risk assessment process

Most UK construction guidance follows the HSE’s five-step approach. This works well on live sites because it is practical and repeatable.

1. Identify the hazards

Walk the site and review planned activities. Common construction hazards include:

Hazards should reflect real site conditions, not just standard categories.

2. Decide who might be harmed and how

Go beyond “site workers”. Consider:

  • specific trades (groundworkers, scaffolders, electricians)

  • subcontractors and agency staff

  • delivery drivers and visitors

  • members of the public near the site

  • cleaners and maintenance staff

This step is critical, as UK law requires risks to non-employees to be considered.

3. Evaluate the risks and decide on controls

Assess how likely harm is and how serious the consequences could be. Then identify controls using a sensible hierarchy:

  • eliminate the hazard where possible

  • reduce the risk through safer methods or design

  • isolate people from the hazard

  • use procedures, supervision and training

  • rely on PPE only as a last line of defence

Controls should be proportionate, practical, and clearly assigned.

4. Record the findings

Construction risk assessments are usually recorded in a table format so they can be briefed easily on site.

A clear record typically includes:

  • the hazard

  • who may be harmed and how

  • existing controls

  • additional actions required

  • who is responsible for each action

  • review date

Recording findings is a legal requirement for most employers and is essential for demonstrating compliance.

5. Review and update regularly

Construction risk assessments are not static documents. They must be reviewed when:

  • work phases change

  • site layouts are altered

  • new equipment or materials are introduced

  • after incidents or near misses

  • weather conditions create new risks

  • staffing or competence changes

Regular review is what keeps a risk assessment “suitable and sufficient”.

Common construction hazards to include

While every site is different, most construction risk assessments will need to address the following areas:

Work at height

Falls remain one of the leading causes of serious injury in construction. Assess edges, roofs, scaffolding, MEWPs and ladders, and ensure suitable edge protection, access and inspection regimes are in place.

Plant and vehicle movements

Reversing vehicles, lifting operations and pedestrian interfaces require clear traffic management plans, segregation, banksmen and exclusion zones.

Excavations and groundworks

Risks include collapse, flooding, hazardous atmospheres and striking buried services. Controls may involve service detection, shoring, barriers, permits and inspections.

Falling objects

Overhead work creates risks from dropped tools and materials. Toe boards, debris netting, tool restraints and exclusion zones are common controls.

Hazardous substances and dust

Construction often involves cement, silica dust, solvents and fuels. Risk assessments may need to link to COSHH assessments where relevant.

Slips, trips and site housekeeping

Poor housekeeping remains a frequent cause of injury. Temporary walkways, lighting and waste management should be assessed.

What should a construction risk assessment template include?

A practical construction risk assessment template typically includes:

  • project and site details

  • description of the task or activity

  • assessor name and date

  • hazards identified

  • who might be harmed and how

  • control measures

  • risk rating (if used)

  • further actions required

  • responsible person

  • review date

Templates are useful starting points, but they must always be adapted to the site and task.

Risk assessments and method statements (RAMS)

Risk assessments and method statements are closely linked but serve different purposes.

  • A risk assessment identifies hazards and specifies the controls required.

  • A method statement explains how the work will be carried out safely, step by step, using those controls.

In construction, these documents are often combined and referred to as RAMS, particularly for higher-risk activities or where clients require detailed planning evidence.

How often should construction risk assessments be reviewed?

There is no fixed timeframe. Reviews should happen whenever there is a significant change, and at regular intervals on longer projects.

A practical approach is:

  • dynamic checks during daily site activity

  • formal reviews at phase changes

  • immediate review after incidents or near misses

The key principle is that the assessment must remain relevant to the work being carried out.

Turn risk assessments into a live safety system

In construction, the biggest failure point in risk assessment is not identifying hazards, it’s keeping assessments accurate, accessible, and up to date as site conditions change. Paper-based documents and static templates struggle to keep pace with moving phases, changing trades, and evolving risks.

BrightHR’s risk assessment software is designed to support this reality of construction work. It allows businesses to:

  • create and update task-specific risk assessments quickly

  • store assessments centrally so supervisors and managers can access the latest version

  • keep a clear audit trail of reviews and changes

  • reduce reliance on outdated paperwork when site conditions change

For construction businesses managing multiple sites, contractors, or phases of work, this approach helps ensure risk assessments stay suitable, sufficient, and usable not just compliant on paper.

 


Hanaan Parkinson-Ramsbottom

Health & Safety Advisor

Share this article


More on